Get VIP invites to recruiting events with popular employers! Sign up here.

MBA Corner
First Time on Brazen?

Syndication and Content Partners

Brazen Life has partnerships with AOL Jobs, Business Insider, Lifehacker, Black Enterprise, Huffington Post, Levo League, Idealist, Media Jobs Daily, TalentCulture, Professional Women of Color Network, Tribune Media Services, Ragan and Trove.

Click here to learn more about syndication opportunities.

Spice Up Your Inbox!

Get invites to exclusive career events, networking opportunities and top career advice.



Tags
Connect

Why You Shouldn’t Be Proud of a 60-Hour Workweek

Tweet Pin It  

buried under paperwork

Your 60-hour work week is not a badge of honor. It’s a problem.

There’s a sense of pride over being able to state that we worked an exorbitant amount of hours this week, last week or last month. I know because I’ve done it in the past, and probably still do it. (Sigh.) After all, saying you worked a 60-hour week is indirectly telling the listener how busy your design firm is, how successful your product is, how important you are to your employer.

It’s essentially a humblebrag.

But as you dig into the 60-hour work week, you realize it’s a problem — and not just for the obvious reasons like work-life balance, burnout, how unhealthy it is, the errors that come with being tired and so forth.

Something is broken

If you’re working 60 hours a week, something has broken down organizationally. You’re doing two people’s jobs. You aren’t telling your boss you’re overworked (or maybe they don’t care). You’re probably a pinch point, a bottleneck. You’re far less productive. You’re frantically swimming against the current, just trying to keep your head above water.

These signs? They are not the signs of a healthy business or work environment. I realize there are going to be those moments here and there, especially if you’re a business owner or in the earlier stages of a startup. But if they’re continual? Something’s broken.

When I work 50 or 60 hour weeks at Paper Leaf, I’m doing something wrong. It means I haven’t learned to balance my workload or manage my time. It means I haven’t communicated to my team that I have too many things on my plate. It means we should hire someone, or at least sub something out. It means I’m working in the business as well as on it. It means I’m being a designer, a marketer, a business developer, a creative director and so on. I’m trying to do too many things.

I’m trying to be too many things.

We need to stop being proud of overworking ourselves. (Click here to tweet this thought.) It’s unhealthy, it stunts the growth of our businesses and it’s unsustainable. Instead, we should be proud of creating or working in an environment that’s efficient, organized and diligent enough to allow people to work regular hours on meaningful work.

It’s something you can control –- so what’s stopping you?

This post originally appeared on the author’s blog.

Jeff Archibald is co-founder of a design firm in Edmonton called Paper Leaf, an award-winning shop focused on brand identities, websites and interfaces. If he’s not learning, creating, speaking or herding cats, he’s partaking in one of his many other loves: coffee, typography, whisky, cycling and the mountains.

Brazen powers real-time, online events for leading organizations around the world. Our lifestyle and career blog, Brazen Life, offers fun and edgy ideas for ambitious professionals navigating the changing world of work.

  • Telemachus_1

    This only makes sense within the context of a sane society that rewards the fruits of civilization to its members without using “work” as the standard.

    That is not the present society. We have a corrupt monetary system that makes it necessary to take on massive debts in order to have a basic life, with insufficient monetary expansion such that households now spend almost 1/3 of their income on interest versus half that 15 years ago. Living standards for the middle class are rapidly declining and their absolute numbers are shrinking.

    We also have the nature of technology, which has rendered anyone with an IQ of less than 100 obsolete for all but the most basic servile tasks. And then we have dysgenic policies that have resulted in an explosion in the population of the very same people who serve no economic purpose. And in the US, we import them by the millions.

    What this means is that in order to get ahead, you must in nearly all cases work significantly harder than you did in the past. A 40-hour work week is a luxury for those who live off of economic rent or the truly exceptional.

    • Disqus

      Thumbs-up for the mention of dysgenics. High time we start culling the herd. As a liberal arts major myself, who serves no economic purpose other than to make burgers or wash toilets, I volunteer to go first.

      Workers of the world, unite! …and abolish the idle eggheads of the “47%”!