login or register at brazencareerist.com

Spice Up Your Inbox!

Sign up for our newsletter and get the latest blog posts, networking events, and discounts on our BrazenU bootcamps.


What Obama’s Jobs Speech Means for Millennials

Pin It  

Obama's victory speech

When President Obama gives his much-anticipated jobs speech on Thursday night, every slice of the population will hope to hear something different.

Corporate executives want lower taxes and less regulation to boost job creation. Others in the business community think the government needs to be more involved and inject federal money to foster growth.

Millions of other Americans could care less about the president’s long-term strategy. What’s most important to them right now is finding a job, earning a paycheck and providing for their families.

But what about us, the Millennial generation? We’re relatively new to the workforce and most likely don’t have children to support, mortgages to pay off and other financial burdens that come with being a full-fledged adult — well, other than school loans.

What do we want to hear from President Obama on Thursday night? 

The answer has four parts but one overarching theme: Mr. President, don’t just dazzle us with your eloquence (why we loved you in 2008). Instead, lay out a plan and show us how we can help you design a stronger economy and meaningful future.

Here’s what Millenials are looking for:

A bold but practical tone

Three years ago, all of us (admit it, you too) swooned over then-Senator Barack Obama’s every word on the campaign trail. He was just so damn cool. We believed in his language of “change” and flooded voting booths to elect him.

Now, the tune has changed. Thousands of young people struggle to find a job and enter the labor market for the very first time.

Political observers and pundits have called on the president to be “bold” with his jobs speech. Lofty rhetoric is great, but Millennials need pragmatism, too. What kinds of industries will be around for the next 30-40 years? How can we get a foothold in those companies, master the skills necessary to assume leadership roles and then become industry leaders in our 40s and 50s?

A focus on manufacturing

Last week, GOP presidential nominee Jon Huntsman laid out his own jobs plan that stresses the need for a robust manufacturing sector, not just a service-based model where we conduct business in khakis and loafers from inside air-conditioned offices.

It might be tough to hear, but the president should echo Huntsman’s plan and tell Americans that we can’t regain our economic footing without a strong manufacturing base. Our generation excels at technical mastery (particularly online), but that shouldn’t excuse us from also making products with our hands. What should America produce, and how can Millennials play an integral role?

A call to tap into the power of the Millennial mind

By now it’s pretty clear: our generation tells everyone else how to use the Internet. We own the social-media space and keep pumping out newer and better ways to connect digitally.

In his speech, the president will no doubt encourage businesses to innovate and develop more cutting-edge technology. To get there, he should leverage the Millennial mind. Put our best and brightest on committees and councils that focus on jobs. Ask us for the smartest and most efficient ways to run companies. It’s time to tap into our collective online brainpower, and let us help guide this country back to prominence.

A reality check — both for us and for the President

If Obama wants to be president for another four years, his tone has got to change. Three years ago, Millennials were willing to believe anything he said. This time around, we’re often skeptical of his leadership. The president needs to level with us about the state of our economy and the work necessary to put our country back on its feet.

We then have to decide as a generation whether this country is worth rescuing from mounting unemployment, severe debt and a general sense that we are weakening on the world stage. It’s the president’s duty to inspire and provide a clear path, but we must carry the torch. One person — not even the president — can’t solve the problems of 300 million.

There’s plenty riding on the president’s job speech Thursday night. But the real challenge is how we choose to respond.

Brazenites, what else are you hoping to hear Obama say Thursday night?

Danny Rubin is a member of the Brazen Contributor Network.

Brazen Life is a lifestyle and career blog for ambitious young professionals. Hosted by Brazen Careerist, we offer edgy and fun ideas for navigating the changing world of work. Be Brazen!

  • http://twitter.com/enviro_writer Erica F

    Not just jobs. Green jobs.

    • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=15001834 Anonymous

      And why green jobs? Because Obama thinks they’re cool, or because many of those jobs apparently require millions in government subsidies to get off the ground?

      Go google the solar panels company Solyndra and decide if that’s a stable means of employment

      • westcoastbarbie

        From Dr. Victor Davis Hanson:
        “Consider also the current government-sponsored notion of “millions of green jobs” — a siren call that Obama and “green-jobs czar” Van Jones voiced to lift the economy and transition America over to sustainable, affordable energy. But tens of billions of wasted dollars later, electricity and gas prices are at near-record levels. The attempt to make subsidized green power competitive by cutting back on fossil-fuel exploration while trying to shut down coal plants and stop gas pipelines has only made energy prices climb and further burdened American households.
        “Meanwhile, hundreds of billions in green subsidies created neither much new energy nor many new jobs. But the massive handouts did provide a lot of public money in sweetheart deals to administration-friendly companies that either went broke, outsourced jobs to China, or hired the unemployed at insane costs, sometimes at $2 million per worker.
        “Yet despite the dismal record, President Obama is still touting the same-old, same-old, 2008 “millions of green jobs” mantra, apparently on the fallacious notion that massive subsidies to government-supported plants like Evergreen Solar in Massachusetts and Johnson Controls in Michigan [and Solyndra] have not worked too well — only because there were not enough costly investments.”

    • westcoastbarbie

      What is a green job? And why are so many hung up on this concept? Do you fear we’re running out of resources? ‘Taint so. That’s what Malthus thought – but he forgot about the single most important resource we have: the human mind. That’s what got us enough food to feed us – and if you look at famines, there hasn’t been a famine in at least the last 500 years that wasn’t caused by inept or evil leaders preventing distribution of food grown in their own countries getting to those in need. This due most often to political objectives, sometimes (not often) ineptness.
      Raw materials? The ability of mankind to find or develop substitutes for dwindling raw materials has been shown throughout history to be one of our greatest achievements. And oil. Consider that if you took everything out of your house that is petroleum-based and put it on the front lawn, there wouldn’t be much left in it. Even your medications would be out there – along with the roof and much of the building materials themselves.

  • http://alexisgrant.com Alexis Grant

    Great piece, Danny — Really got me thinking about what to expect on Thursday evening!

  • John

    That’s “One person – even the president – can’t solve the problems….”

  • http://profiles.google.com/amanda.phipps Amanda Phipps

    I would like to see an emphasis on green jobs. I also believe that statutes and over regulation are crippling United States businesses and that should be addressed. If you want my down right honest opinion – more states should be “right to work” states. Unions long served their purpose decades ago and now block and prevent forward progress.

    • westcoastbarbie

      If you want emphasis on green jobs, how does that square with your concern with over-regulation? Green jobs depend on regulation. If they’re so good, why hasn’t the market been all over them? Clue: they aren’t cost effective. Look at England, Spain, Italy. Spain has lost thousands of jobs by regulating the use of solar and wind.

      • http://www.madamenergy.com Megan Atkinson

        I would like to point out that the market *has* been all over them. The Energy Services sector is booming with growth and lack the appropriate candidates (mostly due to energy education options not being available frequently enough just yet). This industry is projected to double within 10 years and the average energy pro is 50 years old/retiring soon – leaving the energy services market facing a huge need for people.

        Green jobs just *look* different here. They have different titles and different niches. Green jobs in the US don’t focus on renewables as heavily – they focus on energy efficiency and energy management.

        • westcoastbarbie

          Green jobs exist because there are subsidies (your money) available for start-ups. Those start-ups wouldn’t exist without them.

          As for ‘energy education,’ it isn’t that it isn’t available (geology, engineering — petroleum, civil, electrical, chemical, mechanical, nuclearl); all are available but not as many are entering these fields here in the US mainly because they take work and other fields such as Women’s Studies, sociology, Crit Lit, are much easier.

          It will be those engineering fields that will be sorting out efficiency and management issues.

          BTW, why not consider the greenest of green – nuclear power?

  • Anon

    I wonder why this post makes the assumption that an entire age group — just by virtue of an accident of birth? — swooned over the president and found him to be cool. Unless, perhaps, all Millennials had some kind of convention and voted the author chief spokesperson? Surely there are other merits to this post, but it’s hard to see them for the immature tone.

    • Dannyh Rubin

      I actually was voted chief spokesperson at the 2008 Millennial Voters Convention. I’m glad you remembered that. I gave some pretty rousing speeches, if I recall.

      OK, so you clearly didn’t vote for Obama in 2008. Sorry for lumping you in. If it helps, switch my words ‘all of us’ to ‘many of us.’

      But don’t scrap my argument over one phrase. Obama’s popularity among young people was undeniable in 2008. Now he should treat the relationship with a bit more care. Demonstrate he’s thinking about young adults and the problems we’re inheriting.

      Many of us — certainly not all — seem blissfully unaware of how our broken economy will impact the rest of our lives. Frank honesty from the president tonight could wake us up and get us thinking hard about solutions.

  • Leslie Hobgood

    Ok, more lame, dead and worthless promises…..jobs. It is just talk and there will not be any action, like EVERY time before. Only job to be created will be for Mr. Obama when he is voted out…..now that will be COOL.

  • http://www.FoodforThin.com TanujaP

    I think it’s strange that Brazen Careerist would support Obama. I mean, I agree – 3 years ago, we were all going gaga. But the reality is that a welfare state is far from the answer and more regulation on business and more bailouts won’t help anyone. I know it sounds weird to say when Wall Street received their bailout saving hundreds of thousands of jobs…however, if the free market is not allowed to work and businesses are not allowed to fail, then we are just ultimately failing ourselves by advocating a failing system. I’m more of a libertarian than a republican mainly because I believe people should be allowed to do whatever they want in their personal lives, but also because I own a small business and I believe that big business with its lobbyists and tax loopholes have hugely unfair advantages over small business. I just wish the consumers could choose for themselves what products/services will prevail and which ones will fail. I really do hope to see some changes in 2012 because tonight’s speech is just going to give America more empty hope without any solid numbers or results to back it up.

    • http://www.jaclynschiff.com Jaclyn Schiff

      Thanks for jumping into the discussion with some interesting points. Brazen is not taking any position here. This is the view point of one of our writers and is not meant to be an endorsement or criticism on behalf of Brazen.

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=16401660 Amy Chin

    “Corporate executives want lower taxes and less regulation to boost job creation.”

    I appreciate the writer’s rose-colored shades, but the truth is many corporate executives want lower taxes and less regulation so that firms in other industries will hire which leads to more disposable income in the pockets of consumers and therefore spurring revenue growth for them. We saw this as a part of the stimulus plan the Bush Administration introduced a few years back. As a result, many corporate executives have reaped the benefits of lowered taxes and fatter wallets but hiring doesn’t go up.